Friday, October 23, 2009

Who's to Blame??

This week I have found the topic of the Hitler Myth to be of most interest to me. In the reading the author states that Hitler's inner circle perhaps perpetuated the myth so much then Adolf Hitler himself began to believe he was invincible. This made me think that in society we do this a lot... letting the little kid who can't sing believe they have a voice like an angel or letting people who aren't very attractive think their God's gift to Earth. We do things like this by human nature to not hurt those around us but then this perpetuation of an untruth leads the person to believe it to be the truth and they do something like embarrass themselves on American Idol or in Hitler's case, attempt world domination. Now while these two instances are not comparable in any form, they both lead to emanate failure. So the question is who is to blame?? Do we blame the loving parent for encouraging their obviously talentless child or do we blame the kid who grows up believing their parents encouragement rather than seeking the truth? I thought about this in my analysis of Hitler. I like most, are quick to blame Adolf Hitler for all of the atrocities of World War II and the Holocaust. But many of us know from first hand experience they humans tend to start believing what they are told continually and of course one wants to fulfill and live up to the praise and hype surrounding their name, whether it's false in actuality or not. I started to think maybe it wasn't Hitler's fault he basically went on a power rampage. He had to know his pitfalls from the beginning, so in order to conceal them he had to find and execute the quickest solution to fulfill all of the hype surrounding him. His successes would lead to more praise by not only his inner circle but the world also(don't forget he was Time's Man of the Year). I don't think in hindsight we will ever know anything about the real Adolf Hitler, because he was transformed into Hitler by those around him. So do we blame the man who tried to live up to the name or do we blame those who indirectly created the entity we know as Hitler??

2 comments:

  1. I disagree with some of your analysis. Hitler was not made by his underlings. Hitler was a rare man, historically driven, and accomplished feats that would be deemed impossible until achieved. Those closest to him were convinced that he was indeed the greatest German of all time. His greatness is undeniable. He was undoubtedly a leader of men. Unfortunately, Hiter wasn't good man, perhaps one of the worst of men. His abuse of power has left the greatest scar on the twentieth century, and his legacy does him justice as one of the greatest villians our species has ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Certainly when one delves into Hitler's background, there are factors that one can point to to try to explain some of his characteristics but ultimately I agree with Matt's comments. Hitler was a risk-taker who read the international situation (as well as the domestic one) and made effective decisions. He was a powerful and compelling leader who led his people to carry out his murderous visions. Hitler was hardly a poor, innocent guy who was led astray by the well-intentions ego-boosting of those around him.

    ReplyDelete